The main segment
of this I would like to discuss today is mentoring. The oxford dictionary
defines a mentor as ‘an experienced or trained advisor’. I have had many
mentors in different parts of my life and have indeed found them all to be
quite experienced. I think the training part of mentorship is more a reflection
of the experiences that the mentor has had.
Keith presented
the idea that mentor could possibly be ‘on call’ at all times. This really hit
the mark for me. A previous cycling coach of mine is someone who I consider a great
mentor of mine. It does to me seem as if he is always ‘on call’ so to speak and
that I can call him about issues I am having in a decision making sense whether
this is to do with cycling, uni or otherwise.
The mentor that
we spoke about in class was also non-judgmental. This non-judgemental mentor
allows the mentoree to explore territory that may be taboo with their mentor and
develop trust in an environment conducive to development.
When talking
about the expert mentor, the mentor always left the final decision to the ‘mentoree’.
Sometimes the mentor does not have to say much they may just have to listen.
This listening may just allow the mentoree to verbalise the situation to
someone and create an environment where the problem is not internalised, but
out in the open. The learner or mentoree then has made their own decision and
they do not become frequently dependant on the advice of the pedagogue or
mentor. It was Anne Rolfe (Synergistic People Development)
that said
“A mentor provides information,
shares their experiences or expresses an opinion. However, it is always the
mentee that decides acts and produces outcomes.”
Mentors essential
in guiding someone to achieve their goals. I have seen firsthand the benefits
of mentorship throughout my academic and my sporting pursuits.
“Behind every successful person, there is one elementary
truth: somewhere, somehow, someone cared about their growth and development.”
-Beverley Kaye (Up is Not the Only
Way, 1997)